define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tao &#8211; Making Chutney</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.makingchutney.com/tag/tao/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.makingchutney.com</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>A new gnosticism?</title>
		<link>https://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/09/a-new-gnosticism/</link>
					<comments>https://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/09/a-new-gnosticism/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 04:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gnosticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philip-k-dick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powers-that-be]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trickster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walter-wink]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/09/a-new-gnosticism/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As promised, a response to Tim Boucher&#8217;s &#8220;Grand Unified Conspiracy Theory&#8221; (in three parts): Boucher is looking for a new gnosticism. I&#8217;ve always found gnosticism bewildering, if metaphysically ambitious. It has its own peculiar beauty, but as I studied it in a mystical theology class in college, I couldn&#8217;t help but think that gnosis and [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/09/a-new-gnosticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>But is it good or bad?</title>
		<link>https://www.makingchutney.com/2006/02/25/but-is-it-good-or-bad/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blasphemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tao]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/02/25/but-is-it-good-or-bad/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The best title for a blog entry I&#8217;ve seen in a while: The Tao of Blasphemy.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>