define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Making Chutney

Introducing the second superpower (hint: you’re it)

04.02.03 | Permalink | Comments Off on Introducing the second superpower (hint: you’re it)

New blogger Jim Moore wonders if the worldwide protest movement of the last five or so years might be the next superpower. Sound silly? Then how about Kyoto, Seattle, Turin, Davos, and the International Criminal Court?

Who is the second superpower? Jim had this to say:

Second superpower people identify themselves as citizens of the world, and care about social development, collaboration, innovation, open societies, and commons. They believe that at heart all people are precious and are one. Second superpower people need not be conventionally liberal or conservative, because there is political and social innovation yet to be done, and current political categories are certainly outmoded. Perhaps people with second superpower beliefs constitute a bit over 10% of the population in the US–let’s say 30 million people. Perhaps there are 40 million more in Europe, and 10 million in Japan, and several million living in the rest of the world in Asia, India, Africa, and South America. Web-enabled, this group is both “virtually local” and realtime mobilized, and is thus an increasingly influential force. On a worldwide basis the activist numbers add up to a very sizable group, despite second superpower members being minorities in their own nations.

So now you know. Very similar to what globalization thinker Richard Falk calls globalization-from-below. Next step? Jim passes along his friend’s suggestion that we run someone for US President, perhaps John Perry Barlow. (I didn’t know who he was and had to look the guy up. He used to write for the Grateful Dead, coined the term “cyberspace,” and is now a Fellow at Harvard.)

I’ll personally have a hard time voting for a Boomer, much less a former hippie, but I could be persuaded. I do know that the Democrats can’t be counted on to include us as a core constituency, and the Greens don’t have their act together enough to make it worth our time. (Please, though, both of you prove me wrong.) However it’s to be done, it needs to start now. If the idea doesn’t catch on by, say, the Fourth of July, it’s dead in the water. I was talking to two wealthy progressives last night, and they were already trying to decide who to give moolah to in the Democratic primary.

If there was a groundswell and if a candidate made it to the ballot, the momentum (judging from past successes) would at least need to be countered by the powers-that-be. And that was enough for the progressive and populist movements of a century ago to get most everything they wanted without ever getting their own candidate into the White House. If Jim’s estimate of 30 million Americans in the movement is accurate, that’s over 25% of the last cycle’s total votes. Does anyone remember how much trouble Ross Perot caused? Imagine what might have happened if he hadn’t been crazy and hadn’t kept jumping in and out of the ring. (And I don’t think that’s a lot to ask for in a candidate.)

Assuming global support for such a candidate, it could have the effect of globalizing Western elections, or at least creating stronger ties between parties of simliar ideologies in different nation-states. Keeping 80 million people content is a real pain in the ass, moreso if they can cause trouble not just at home but also with your allies. (Assuming the US still has allies worthy of the name after Iraq.) It could even move us closer to something resembling a cosmopolitan democracy.

Blogroll updated

03.31.03 | Permalink | 3 Comments

Tweaking just gives me a big case of the deep fried happy. Lots of new categories for my weblog links. Enjoy.

Jesus H. Christ!

03.31.03 | Permalink | 6 Comments

Amongst today’s happenings: (1) The mayor cancelled out of her part in a panel discussion I had planned around her. It’s tomorrow night, and I’d first made contact with her about it most of two months ago. (2) My mother had surgery to fix a little boo-boo the obgyn did–twenty-nine years ago when she gave birth to me. (3) I have a follow-up appointment this afternoon to get my meds adjusted, which I’m dreading.

So rise and shine and give God the glory glory…

Announcing ‘The Polis’

03.30.03 | Permalink | 6 Comments

And so it begins. Some folks commented in my ‘weblog manifesto’ reponse post that it would be swell if there was a blogring for–as The Happy Tutor put it–the “poststructuralist nonconforming postmodernist recovering philosopher web polis.” In the words of one nonconforming philosopher, ask and you shall receive.

Thus, from the depths of the boundless (apologies to Anaximander) arises The Polis–a blogring for recovering philosophers. (And there was much rejoicing.) Here’s the preliminary membership requirements for our snooty little club:

  1. For weblogs only.
  2. All members should be in significant conversation with one or more streams of postmodern/poststructuralist thought. (This does not need to be the weblogs’ primary focus, though.)
  3. All members should be engaged constructively in the (re)formation of civil society.
  4. All members must post the “ringsurf” code on the front page of their weblog. (Which you’ll receive upon joining.)

Mostly painless. To join up, simply go here and fill out the form. (To set up the blogring at Ringsurf I had to specify a homepage, so I’m temporarily hosting it here at MyIrony. It’s my hope that others will want to share responsibility for hosting/membership/etc. as the ring gets going.) Happy blogging. And let’s be careful out there with that guerilla ontology.

Choices already made

03.27.03 | Permalink | 4 Comments

Monday or Tuesday this week I was forwarded an email written to my SO from a mutual acquaintance (and, for me, a former almost-colleague). We’d each gotten to know him at different points in our church camp life cycle, and our paths have had a way of looping back to each other through other people over the years, in a way that only co-religionists can pull off. If I had pursued ordination after seminary, we would have been fellow ministers and probably allies.

In the email he sent me indirect greetings from a former charge of mine during my life as a youth director. My old student, he said, often mentioned me fondly, now some ten years later. My old youth, he said, is now in graduate school studying to be a minister, just like his old youth director.

I hadn’t heard anything from anyone from that church in, well, almost ten years. The last thing I remembered hearing about him was that he turned down a sports scholarship at an Ivy League school to go to the nearest state commuter college–so he could be close to his parents and his girlfriend. And I’d heard that a fundamentalist I faintly knew had taken over as youth director there just as he would’ve been graduating from high school.

Intrigued by the email, I googled my old student. After I dug through all the old news stories about him winning track meets back in high school, I found something current. It was from the charismatic Methodist church I attended just before becoming his youth director. I clicked on the link. He was leading the college group. With the fundamentalist who was his youth director during his senior year.

The same day I read a heartfelt essay by the Dolebludger. (The Australian phrase “on the dole” is roughly the same as the US “on welfare.”) As a young man with green sensibilities he chose a degree in “social ecology,” a choice that continues to make him unemployable over a decade later. In the essay he writes:

The choices I made as a young man in creating my adult identity I now have to deal with today. Some I can live with (my favourite SF novels), some can be unmade (long hair), some can be forgotten (stovepipe trousers) and some can be ignored (anarchist dilettantism). But some choices are unchangeable and unchanging. Some choices create ineffectual futures, times in which past sacrifices are nullified not rewarded.

One meaning of “decision” is a cutting off of possibilities, eliminating the many could be’s for one will be. In my case, my adolescent choice to go into the ministry was shaped by the hopes of my fundamentalist/charismatic community, my budding depression and desire to assuage it through “spiritual highs,” and the fears of the future of a bright working class boy who went to a upper middle class high school.
Click to continue reading “Choices already made”

US Turning to Fascism?

03.27.03 | Permalink | 2 Comments

Earlier this month I read somewhere that Mussolini defined fascism as the union of the State with the Corporation. Well, having grown up with friends whose parents worked for Halliburton, that scared the bejeezus out of me.

So I’ve been reading up on fascism. Just read Mussolini himself. So is the US becoming fascist? If I were America’s psychiatrist, I’d answer, “You do have some fascist qualities, but, no, you do not have fascism.” More later.

« Previous Entries
» Next Entries