Popular scientist Richard Dawkins proposes we start using the word “brights” to refer to atheists, agnostics, freethinkers, and humanists. Mostly they are naturalists as opposed to supernaturalists. (With emphasis especially on “as opposed to.”)
Dawkins and his fellow “brights” hope to use the word in the same way that the homosexual community used “gay” as a tool to overcome prejudice. Take a word with a positive connotation, get everyone to start using it instead of words with a negative connotation, and watch your group suffer less persecution. All in all, a good strategy.
But I have two problems with it. One, “brights” are not persecuted or oppressed, unless by “oppressed” you mean that they are less likely to be the high school quarterback than the president of the honor society. Unless by “persecuted” you mean that they are mocked for wearing Vulcan ears to the Star Trek convention. I could support the term simply on the basis that its easier than saying “atheists, agnostics, freethinkers, and humanists,” but “oppressed” they are not. True, they never quite claim out and out oppression, but the comparison to the gay community implies it, and they do say things like this:
Click to continue reading “Integrals, anyone?”
I am proud proud proud of my heritage. But who can blame me?
The Happy Tutor’s reframing of AKMA’s post on preaching has got me thinking more about the role of sacred stories. You’ll remember that I defined kerygma as the transformative relationship between a sacred story, a preacher preaching, and an assembly hearing. Earlier I argued that knowledge of god comes from four sources: experiences, traditions, reasons, and sacred texts. I then went on to outline the dialetic between sacred stories and sacred texts. But I haven’t said enough yet about the dialectic between experience, text and story.
Click to continue reading “But what is your story?”
JERUSALEM—After being away for nearly two millennia, Jesus Christ triumphantly returned Monday to pick up some of His old belongings. “I realize this isn’t exactly how the world’s Christians were imagining it, but I left a really comfortable pair of sandals in Galilee, and I wanted them back,” said Christ, who died for our sins. “Also, I’m pretty sure I lent [Apostle] Simon Peter my best goblet at the Last Supper.” This marks Christ’s first return since 76 A.D., when he thought he’d forgotten to turn off his coffee pot. (From The Onion.)
In an effort to make MyIrony more accessible, I’ve switched the site over to an “em”-based style sheet from a pica- and point-based style sheet. For those of you who don’t speak CSS (and I don’t encourage you to do so), that means that when you shift the text size in your browser (in IE, View>>Text Size) the entire site shifts to accomodate. And by “shifts,” I mean really shifts. Yet another (tediously completed) milestone in the march of irony.
What do you get when you cross the Masons, Promise Keepers, and Washington powerbrokers? Answer: ‘The Family.’
Previously known as National Committee for Christian Leadership, International Christian Leadership, the National Leadership Council, Fellowship House, the Fellowship Foundation, the National Fellowship Council, and the International Foundation (got all that?), the Family operates thousands of “cell groups” that it describes as “publicly invisible but privately identifiable group of companions.”
It’s mission? David Coe, son of current Family leader Doug Coe, described it thus to a group of young recruits:
“That’s the way everything in life happens. If you’re a person known to be around Jesus, you can go and do anything. And that’s who you guys are. When you leave here, you’re not only going to know the value of Jesus, you’re going to know the people who rule the world. It’s about vision. ‘Get your vision straight, then relate.’ Talk to the people who rule the world, and help them obey. Obey Him. If I obey Him myself, I help others do the same. You know why? Because I become a warning. We become a warning. We warn everybody that the future king is coming. Not just of this country or that, but of the world.” Then he pointed at the map, toward [Genhis] Khan’s vast, reclaimable empire.
Click to continue reading “Our Fuehrer, Who Art in Heaven: Part 1”