define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Why “god” and “God™?”
https://www.makingchutney.com/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/
One part facial hair. Two parts moxy.Tue, 09 Sep 2003 23:08:38 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4
By: Philocrites
https://www.makingchutney.com/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/comment-page-1/#comment-324
Tue, 09 Sep 2003 23:08:38 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/#comment-324More chutney, please!
“Our god is not a braggart, is not needy, does not require worship, does not claim credit,” Chutney proposes so let’s not capitalize. There’s more… Will Shetterly is looking for a flexible definition of God, too, and offers these…
]]>
By: David Soliday
https://www.makingchutney.com/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/comment-page-1/#comment-323
Thu, 05 Jun 2003 04:44:11 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/#comment-323Well done! Thank you.
David
]]>
By: chutney
https://www.makingchutney.com/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/comment-page-1/#comment-322
Wed, 04 Jun 2003 05:13:16 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/#comment-322(Mono)theism is the belief in one god — or “one-god-ism.” Pantheism is the belief that the universe is god — “all-god-ism.” Panentheism is the belief that the universe is within god (and, often, also that god is within the universe)–“all-in-god-ism.” (Theism, unlike panentheism or pantheism, usually places the one god “above and beyond” the universe, not within it.)
]]>
By: Anonymous
https://www.makingchutney.com/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/comment-page-1/#comment-321
Wed, 04 Jun 2003 05:03:58 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/06/02/why-god-and-god/#comment-321What is panentheism? Not in dictionary.com.
]]>