define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UU &#8211; Making Chutney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/tag/uu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:36:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>UUs&#8217; Real Problem: White Collarism</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/08/18/uus-real-problem-white-collarism/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/08/18/uus-real-problem-white-collarism/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white collarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiteness]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Continuing the conversation about UU cultural identity, I want to suggest that what&#8217;s hurting us the most isn&#8217;t white privilege but what I call &#8220;white collarism.&#8221; What does white collarism look like?  Here are two of it&#8217;s unspoken assumptions: The assumption that others would share my cultural or political views and interests if only they [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/08/18/uus-real-problem-white-collarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What We&#8217;re Doing Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/08/12/what-were-doing-wrong/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/08/12/what-were-doing-wrong/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiteness]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vessel has already posted a great response to John Katz&#8217; recent UU World article defending UU culture, so I&#8217;ll just focus on one sentence: If non-whites can meld so easily into our snob-culture that it becomes invisible even to them, then someone please tell me what we’re doing wrong. Really, you don&#8217;t see any barriers to [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/08/12/what-were-doing-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worst Case Scenario: Phoenix 2012 Boycott</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/14/worst-case-scenario-phoenix-2012-boycott/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/14/worst-case-scenario-phoenix-2012-boycott/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ga]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t think anyone has asked yet who might take our place in Phoenix if we do decide to boycott. Just for the sake of argument, what if the Tea Party or some nativist organization took our spot and showed up with 4,000 conventioneers, 500 of whom turned out for a demonstration at the state capitol [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/14/worst-case-scenario-phoenix-2012-boycott/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhetoric and reality: Phoenix 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ga]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The rhetoric is starting to get a little heated, and one blogger has already apologized for stepping over the line.  There&#8217;s going to be more and more temptation to bring out weapons of rhetorical mass destruction as we get closer and closer to GA. I&#8217;m not a delegate, but if I were, I would be [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who loses with regions?</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/02/23/who-loses-with-regions/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/02/23/who-loses-with-regions/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uua]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1510</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[UU World put up a good article yesterday about the move from districts to regions. If you don&#8217;t know, the country is divided into 19 regions now, and it looks like we&#8217;re headed to merging them together to come up with five regions instead. What I&#8217;m wondering is who loses in the move from districts [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/02/23/who-loses-with-regions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Therapy, Criticism, and Heresy&#8212;Which Is UU?</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/01/28/therapy-criticism-and-heresy-which-is-uu/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/01/28/therapy-criticism-and-heresy-which-is-uu/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zizek]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just finished up The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity by Slavoj Zizek, the so-called wildman of philosophy. And I keep going back to a passage on the very first page of the intro. In it, Zizek says that religion in our current day of global empire is limited to two [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/01/28/therapy-criticism-and-heresy-which-is-uu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you teach the P&#038;P?  A death match of death!</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/07/15/how-do-you-teach-the-pp-a-death-match-of-death/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/07/15/how-do-you-teach-the-pp-a-death-match-of-death/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P&P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chalicechick reminds us that, though the Principles &#38; Purposes are not a creed, they are treated as one by most UUs.  If she&#8217;s right about that, those of us who teach new member classes are in the difficult position of needing to teach newcomers about a creed that&#8217;s not a creed. How should we teach [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/07/15/how-do-you-teach-the-pp-a-death-match-of-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UU Women Endorse Morales</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/04/27/uu-women-endorse-morales/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/04/27/uu-women-endorse-morales/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uua]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The UU Women&#8217;s Federation board has unanimously endorsed Peter Morales for president of the UUA. For a while it seemed like all the powers-that-be were lining up behind Laurel Hallman. Now it gets a little more interesting.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/04/27/uu-women-endorse-morales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What congregational membership means</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/26/what-congregational-membership-means/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/26/what-congregational-membership-means/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiation rituals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uus]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/26/what-congregational-membership-means/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I want to lay out the perspective on congregational membership that I&#8217;ve been using in my work as a membership director in a large UU congregation over the last year or so. Maybe this can add to the conversation about the meaning and scope of UU identity and the importance of initiation rituals in a [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/26/what-congregational-membership-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pretend there are no members</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/25/pretend-there-are-no-members/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membership]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/25/pretend-there-are-no-members/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pretend there are no individual members of individual UU congregations. How would the movement go about being the movement?]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>