define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>seminary &#8211; Making Chutney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/tag/seminary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ministers: Are you grateful?</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/25/ministers-are-you-grateful/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/25/ministers-are-you-grateful/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministerial-formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/25/ministers-are-you-grateful/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Attention all ordained ministers: I have a burning question for you. Thinking back to your candidacy process, is that a process you are grateful for now? (As opposed to being grateful that it&#8217;s over.) And were you grateful for it then? I&#8217;m asking specifically about the denominational vetting process&#8212;interviews, position papers, etc.&#8212;as opposed to seminary [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/25/ministers-are-you-grateful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perfect bag for a seminarian</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/19/perfect-bag-for-a-seminarian/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/19/perfect-bag-for-a-seminarian/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdiv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/19/perfect-bag-for-a-seminarian/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Or seminary graduate. Now on sale for only $500 a credit hour.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/19/perfect-bag-for-a-seminarian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did your seminary have a class on homemaking?</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/08/16/did-your-seminary-have-a-class-on-homemaking/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/08/16/did-your-seminary-have-a-class-on-homemaking/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baptists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homemakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/08/16/did-your-seminary-have-a-class-on-homemaking/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This one&#8217;s going to. I suppose it&#8217;s a prereq for an MRS degree.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/08/16/did-your-seminary-have-a-class-on-homemaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No pulpits for seminarians, no seminarians for pulpits</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/10/03/no-pulpits-for-seminarians-no-seminarians-for-pulpits/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/10/03/no-pulpits-for-seminarians-no-seminarians-for-pulpits/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/10/03/no-pulpits-for-seminarians-no-seminarians-for-pulpits/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A recent Washington Post piece says that only 50-65% of seminary graduates find ministry jobs, matching up with an earlier NYTimes piece that said much the same. However, the WP piece talks about pulpit shortages, but the NYT piece talks about twentysomething seminarians choosing not to go into the ministry. Add to that anecdotal evidence [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/10/03/no-pulpits-for-seminarians-no-seminarians-for-pulpits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>28 things they won&#8217;t teach you in seminary</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/08/03/28-things-they-wont-teach-you-in-seminary/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/08/03/28-things-they-wont-teach-you-in-seminary/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 01:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/08/03/28-things-they-wont-teach-you-in-seminary/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Every wonder what ministers don&#8217;t learn in seminary? Quite a bit that you&#8217;d think they would need to know. I compiled this incomplete list with my pal Silver Tongued Devil, a fellow seminary graduate. All of these are from our own seminary experiences or those of close friends. Please add your own at the end, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/08/03/28-things-they-wont-teach-you-in-seminary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Follow up: The gifts and graces for ministry</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/07/31/follow-up-the-gifts-and-graces-for-ministry/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/07/31/follow-up-the-gifts-and-graces-for-ministry/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blessed-community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congregationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ekklesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upaya]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/07/31/follow-up-the-gifts-and-graces-for-ministry/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A People So Bold and Boy in the Bands have each responded to my recent salvo on what ministry is and ain&#8217;t. Some further thoughts: 1. Ministry is not a profession. The professions&#8212;law, medicine, and psychology, most typically&#8212;are necessarily self-serving guilds. By credentialing and policing their members, they preserve the power to control public access [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/07/31/follow-up-the-gifts-and-graces-for-ministry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The gifts and graces for ministry</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/07/28/the-gifts-and-graces-for-ministry/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/07/28/the-gifts-and-graces-for-ministry/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministerial-formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/07/28/the-gifts-and-graces-for-ministry/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s no secret here that I grew up in the crossfire between free range charismatics and institutional Methodist bureaucracy, so it should come as little surprise that I have strong feelings about seminary, denominational credentialing and ministry. One half of my church life taught me that anyone with the gifts and graces for ministry was [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/07/28/the-gifts-and-graces-for-ministry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seminary students getting ordained?  Only 50%</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/03/18/seminary-students-getting-ordained-only-50/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 01:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/03/18/seminary-students-getting-ordained-only-50/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yup, I feel a lot better now. Only half of my fellow seminary graduates go into the ministry these days. The trend changed in the 90s, mostly among the under 30 crowd, which either makes me a stereotypical trendsetter or trend follower. Believe me, I&#8217;ll be using these figures in my next few job interviews. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A better way to do ministerial formation</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/11/15/a-new-way-to-do-ministerial-formation/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/11/15/a-new-way-to-do-ministerial-formation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministerial-formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ordained ministry is been overprofessionalized. When you expect people (without ever coming out and saying it) to live in genteel poverty for their first ten or fifteen years, and when most new ministers take out huge loans and have children to support, well, it just isn&#8217;t right. Add to that the &#8220;entrepreneurial&#8221; bit, as Scott [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/11/15/a-new-way-to-do-ministerial-formation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>