define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>evangelicals &#8211; Making Chutney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/tag/evangelicals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 01:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How Evangelicalism gets in the way of being evangelical</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/11/04/how-evangelicalism-gets-in-the-way-of-being-evangelical/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/11/04/how-evangelicalism-gets-in-the-way-of-being-evangelical/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergent-church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/11/04/how-evangelicalism-gets-in-the-way-of-being-evangelical/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For those interested in Evangelicalism, there&#8217;s a groovy discussion of where it&#8217;s at and where it&#8217;s going at Café Theology. It&#8217;s a good fly-on-the-wall read of several evangelical academics worrying and wondering about the direction of their movement. (Hat tip to Tall Skinny Kiwi.) I found the discussion, in a word, confusing. I came out [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/11/04/how-evangelicalism-gets-in-the-way-of-being-evangelical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The evangelical crackup</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/28/the-evangelical-crackup/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/28/the-evangelical-crackup/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill bybels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guiliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james dobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious right]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/28/the-evangelical-crackup/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The NYT Magazine has a great article on what looks to be a split in the evangelical base between old guard propagandists like Focus on the Family&#8217;s James Dobson and younger, moderate evangelicals like Bill Hybels, pastor of the Willow Creek megachurch movement. With Dobson and his crew already threatening to leave the GOP if [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/28/the-evangelical-crackup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atheist father vs. evangelical daughter</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/04/atheist-father-vs-evangelical-daughter/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/04/atheist-father-vs-evangelical-daughter/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 03:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/04/atheist-father-vs-evangelical-daughter/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An atheist father writes in to Salon&#8217;s advice columnist to ask what he should do about his daughter weeping because daddy is going to hell. The columnist suggests he buck up and go to church with his daughter. Commenters advise taking her to a different faith community each week, taking her to a UU congregation, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/04/atheist-father-vs-evangelical-daughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will be number three?</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d-james-kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelism-explosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerry-falwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul-and-jan-crouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tbn]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dead evangelical leader #1: Jerry Falwell. Dead evangelical leader #2: D. James Kennedy. Who will be next? The easy money is on Pat Robertson. I&#8217;m gonna go out on a limb here though and say Paul and Jan Crouch in a plane crash. You could even call it an &#8220;evangelism explosion.&#8221; Thank you. I&#8217;ll be [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holy Land Experience 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/08/27/holy-land-experience-20/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/08/27/holy-land-experience-20/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible-park-usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holy-land-experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nashville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theme-parks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/08/27/holy-land-experience-20/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You probably already know about the Holy Land Experience, an evangelical theme park in Orlando. Looks like it might get some competition. A $150 million theme park called Bible Park USA is being planned for Rutherford County, Tennessee, outside of Nashville. Roughly the same size as Dollywood, the theme park is being welcomed by Chamber [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/08/27/holy-land-experience-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mommy, what&#8217;s an evangelical?</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/mommy-whats-an-evangelical/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/mommy-whats-an-evangelical/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Slate.com makes a good stab at it.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelicals: Put up or shut up</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/01/27/evangelicals-put-up-or-shut-up/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/01/27/evangelicals-put-up-or-shut-up/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible_belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[true_love_waits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2005/01/27//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Flagship evangelical magazine Christianity Today is running a remarkable article detailing exactly how unchristian most evangelicals really are, according to a series of Gallup and Barna polls. Among the many things learned: Divorce rates are slightly higher among evangelicals than among non-evangelicals. States dominated by evangelicals (the Bible Belt) have the highest divorce rates. Evangelicals [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/01/27/evangelicals-put-up-or-shut-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>