define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bible &#8211; Making Chutney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/tag/bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Two new Bibles I like, and a question</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/10/26/two-new-bibles-i-like-and-a-question/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/10/26/two-new-bibles-i-like-and-a-question/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lectionary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosaic bible]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last week I did something I haven&#8217;t done in years&#8212;I bought two new Bibles!  So far, I think I like them both quite a bit. The first one, and the one getting all the press, is the new Mosaic Bible.  I&#8217;ve been calling this my new liberal artsy fartsy Bible, though the translation is the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2009/10/26/two-new-bibles-i-like-and-a-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wish I had an alien Bible</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/13/wish-i-had-an-alien-bible/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/13/wish-i-had-an-alien-bible/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[translations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/13/wish-i-had-an-alien-bible/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will Shetterly is starting up his cool translation of Genesis again, and it has me thinking about what my ideal Bible translation would be like. I&#8217;d like a Bible that preserves the unique character of a collection of literature written in a number of ancient cultures that are now alien to us. I don&#8217;t want [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2008/02/13/wish-i-had-an-alien-bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scribe Jamboree: 10/20/2006</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/10/20/scribe-jamboree-10202006/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible-translations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary-worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergent-church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seven-wonders-of-the-world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spiritual-gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal-mart]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/10/20/scribe-jamboree-10202006/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bunches of lots of good reads this week from our blog pals at The Daily Scribe: A controversial new bible translation cuts out the needlessly controversial parts of the gospels&#8212;like giving all your money to the poor. If Christians don&#8217;t use it, it ain&#8217;t there no more. (Subversive Influence) Yet Another UU asks, &#8220;What if [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Scribbler: 2006/08/18</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/08/18/friday-scribbler-20060815/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afterlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/08/18/friday-scribbler-20060815/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Stuff you should check out from some of my fellow Daily Scribblers: A People So Bold! reminds us why Garrison Keillor likes to pick on Unitarians. He also goes off on this-little-light-of-mine romanticism masquerading as ministry. A Pagan Sojourn fills us in on the Heathen (Norse pagan) afterlife&#8212;Wyrd, Ragnarok, Hel, and much more. Lo-Fi Tribe [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the Bible changed for me</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/19/when-the-bible-changed-for-me/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/19/when-the-bible-changed-for-me/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/19/when-the-bible-changed-for-me/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Moment one: When I quit reading it by the verse and started to read it by the chapter. Moment two: When I quit reading it by the chapter and started to read it by the book. Moment three: When I quit reading it by the book and started to let the books be in conversation [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/19/when-the-bible-changed-for-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salvos against Christian orthodoxy</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/02/salvos-against-christian-orthodoxy/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/02/salvos-against-christian-orthodoxy/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heresy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/02/salvos-against-christian-orthodoxy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a discussion at Eclectic Itchings, I&#39;m reminded of my own journey away from Christian orthodoxy some years ago.&#160; No one of the thoughts listed below convinced me on its own, but taken together I found them compelling. &#160; What I would like to see the Emerging Church do is to deeply engage questions like [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/06/02/salvos-against-christian-orthodoxy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rape, circumcision, massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/05/16/rape-circumcision-massacre/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/05/16/rape-circumcision-massacre/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 18:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slate.com]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/05/16/rape-circumcision-massacre/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Slate.com editor David Plotz is blogging the Bible.  A &#8220;lax but well-educated Jew,&#8221; Plotz is reading Genesis himself for the first time, without the filter of rabbis or commentary.  No more watered down Sunday School versions for him.  He starts with the rape of Jacob&#8217;s daughter and the resulting massacre of a town by his [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/05/16/rape-circumcision-massacre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Pat Robertson is unbiblical</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/01/06/why-pat-robertson-is-not-biblical/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/01/06/why-pat-robertson-is-not-biblical/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deutoronomist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat-robertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbiblical]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/01/06/why-pat-robertson-is-not-biblical/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(Originally posted on Healing Hagar.) The dominant theology of a good deal of the stories of the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible is simple enough: please god and you&#8217;ll be blessed, displease god and you&#8217;ll suffer. You can see it as early as Genesis. Adam and Eve displease god and get kicked out of Eden. Humanity displeases [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/01/06/why-pat-robertson-is-not-biblical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bible the &#8220;Word of God?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/11/17/bible-the-word-of-god/</link>
					<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/11/17/bible-the-word-of-god/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word-of-god]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2005/11/17/bible-the-word-of-god/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The evangelical claim that the Bible is the &#8220;Word of God&#8221; is a curious one. In the first chapter of John&#8217;s Gospel we learn that Christ is the Word of God. If Christ is the Word of God made flesh, then is the Bible the Word of God made ink? Yet for all of evangelicals&#8217; [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/11/17/bible-the-word-of-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>