<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Making Chutney &#187; atheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/tag/atheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:01:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Falwell 2.0 says quit antagonizing atheists</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/16/falwell-20-says-quit-antagonizing-atheists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/16/falwell-20-says-quit-antagonizing-atheists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam harris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/16/falwell-20-says-quit-antagonizing-atheists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan Falwell seems to have taken over daddy&#8217;s empire. Which means he sends out a weekly email to the flock. In his most recent email, he talks about the New Atheism. There are a lot of references to atheist books and websites (one and two). I wonder how many of his folks will go out [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/16/falwell-20-says-quit-antagonizing-atheists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Christopher Hitchens is so angry</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/11/why-christopher-hitchens-is-so-angry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/11/why-christopher-hitchens-is-so-angry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher-hitchens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/11/why-christopher-hitchens-is-so-angry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You tell the Friendly Atheist&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/10/11/why-christopher-hitchens-is-so-angry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Dawkins wants to get to know you better</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/26/richard-dawkins-wants-to-get-to-know-you-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/26/richard-dawkins-wants-to-get-to-know-you-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard-dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/26/richard-dawkins-wants-to-get-to-know-you-better/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly, this is too much. Professional atheist Richard Dawkins has started a social network for atheists on his own website, at richarddawkins.net/social. Okay, I get it that someone wants to start a social network for atheists. Not a bad idea. Why not? But putting it on your own, named domain as a subdirectory? Doesn&#8217;t exactly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/26/richard-dawkins-wants-to-get-to-know-you-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet Another UU does atheism</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/21/ye-another-uu-does-atheism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/21/ye-another-uu-does-atheism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/21/ye-another-uu-does-atheism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check it out.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/21/ye-another-uu-does-atheism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response to Hafidha: Atheism is all about Coke</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/20/response-to-hafidha-atheism-is-all-about-coke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/20/response-to-hafidha-atheism-is-all-about-coke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coca-cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polytheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/20/response-to-hafidha-atheism-is-all-about-coke/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the comments, Hafidha asks me to spell out how I can say I&#8217;m not a theist or atheist but then say I&#8217;m something of a panentheist. My answer: there&#8217;s theism and then there&#8217;s theism. By &#8220;theism,&#8221; most folks usually mean monotheism, with one god who is all-knowing, all-powerful, all-present, and all-loving. Different flavors of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/20/response-to-hafidha-atheism-is-all-about-coke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Find the atheist</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/14/find-the-atheist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/14/find-the-atheist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/14/find-the-atheist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An atheist is usually defined as either (a) someone who has no belief in God or (b) someone who believes God doesn&#8217;t exist. (Passive vs. active atheism.) Sharon Welch defines her own atheism as someone who does not desire God. Then there are those of us who desire a God we do not believe in. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/14/find-the-atheist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is religion amoral?</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/02/is-religion-amoral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/02/is-religion-amoral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amoral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharon-welch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/02/is-religion-amoral/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back to Sharon Welch in After Empire. An atheist, she writes: What, then, is the religious? This is the name we give to those encounters and energies that are constitutive but amoral, those encounters that are vivid, compelling, and meaningful, but fragile. (Page 30.) I&#8217;m still chewing on that.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/02/is-religion-amoral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santa Claus and the New Atheists&#8482;</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/06/28/santa-claus-and-the-new-atheists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/06/28/santa-claus-and-the-new-atheists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher-hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new-atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard-dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa-claus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/06/28/santa-claus-and-the-new-atheists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been thinking lately about the New Atheists&#8482;&#8212;the Christopher Hitchenses and Richard Dawkinses, with their best selling books and talk show appearances. I&#8217;ve been asking myself: Why is this New Atheism&#8482; so important to them? The god they don&#8217;t believe in is a Tooth Fairy god, a Santa Claus god, a god of the gaps. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/06/28/santa-claus-and-the-new-atheists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scribe Jamboree: 11/17/2006</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/17/scribe-jamboree-11172006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/17/scribe-jamboree-11172006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATLBloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel-dennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim-wallis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressive-christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard-dawkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/17/scribe-jamboree-11172006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some groovy posts from the good folks at The Daily Scribe: Blogickal is back after some star-crossed blog difficulties. Musings points out the rapid growth of the progressive Christian community and asks for hands for the harvest. Jspot wants to know if progressive Christian leader Jim Wallis had declared war on the secular left. Atheist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/17/scribe-jamboree-11172006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
