define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rhetoric and reality: Phoenix 2012	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:51:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: chutney		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-15772</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1575#comment-15772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The work of SSL has a broad consensus among UUs.  I&#039;m trying to suggest ground rules for how we try to persuade each other when there isn&#039;t a clear consensus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The work of SSL has a broad consensus among UUs.  I&#8217;m trying to suggest ground rules for how we try to persuade each other when there isn&#8217;t a clear consensus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill_Baar@hotmail.com		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-15771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill_Baar@hotmail.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1575#comment-15771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does the &quot;Standing On the Side of Love&quot; frame work for an issue like the Az Law given your three bullets?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the &#8220;Standing On the Side of Love&#8221; frame work for an issue like the Az Law given your three bullets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bloggers urge civility, explore social justice, and take responsibility for BP &#171; uuworld.org : The Interdependent Web		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-15770</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bloggers urge civility, explore social justice, and take responsibility for BP &#171; uuworld.org : The Interdependent Web]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1575#comment-15770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] one of those tough ethical problems. All the rhetoric needs to start with the assumption that this is a tough one, and that there isn’t a clear cut answer. We’re a pretty bright and a pretty well-intentioned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] one of those tough ethical problems. All the rhetoric needs to start with the assumption that this is a tough one, and that there isn’t a clear cut answer. We’re a pretty bright and a pretty well-intentioned [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PRK		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-15769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1575#comment-15769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The toughest ethical problems aren’t a choice between a good alternative and a bad alternative.  The tough ones are when you have to figure out which is the better of several goods, or even the better of several bads.&quot;

MC - you are my hero!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The toughest ethical problems aren’t a choice between a good alternative and a bad alternative.  The tough ones are when you have to figure out which is the better of several goods, or even the better of several bads.&#8221;</p>
<p>MC &#8211; you are my hero!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-15755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1575#comment-15755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Right on the mark.  It&#039;s hard to dial back the rhetorical fervor when it reaches a certain point, but we need to try.  And this situation really is a tough one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on the mark.  It&#8217;s hard to dial back the rhetorical fervor when it reaches a certain point, but we need to try.  And this situation really is a tough one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kinsi		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-15753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kinsi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1575#comment-15753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Right on.  I think anyone who is going into GA with their mind made up and set in stone over this is doing everyone a disservice.  

Some people out there seem to be firmly in one camp or the other, without hearing from others.  I know I&#039;m leaning towards voting against the amendment to move GA, but I&#039;m by no means set in stone yet.  [There&#039;s only one thing I&#039;m set in stone on (the presidential search committee - that&#039;s getting a loud no vote from me) going into GA.]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on.  I think anyone who is going into GA with their mind made up and set in stone over this is doing everyone a disservice.  </p>
<p>Some people out there seem to be firmly in one camp or the other, without hearing from others.  I know I&#8217;m leaning towards voting against the amendment to move GA, but I&#8217;m by no means set in stone yet.  [There&#8217;s only one thing I&#8217;m set in stone on (the presidential search committee &#8211; that&#8217;s getting a loud no vote from me) going into GA.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2010/06/12/rhetoric-and-reality-phoenix-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-15752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=1575#comment-15752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, MC.  The reminder I needed most was the first one.  I get frustrated when we want to make big statements that don&#039;t have much impact, but it&#039;s good to remember that our statement-making comes from our good intentions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, MC.  The reminder I needed most was the first one.  I get frustrated when we want to make big statements that don&#8217;t have much impact, but it&#8217;s good to remember that our statement-making comes from our good intentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>