<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who will be number three?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: chutney</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14330</link>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14330</guid>
		<description>Ouch, David.  Way to turn the tables on the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, David.  Way to turn the tables on the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4alarm</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14329</link>
		<dc:creator>4alarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14329</guid>
		<description>for the next fundie to croak or for me to maintain my entertainment level when PR kicks the bucket?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the next fundie to croak or for me to maintain my entertainment level when PR kicks the bucket?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4alarm</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14327</link>
		<dc:creator>4alarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14327</guid>
		<description>ba dum bum. but if robertson goes next where will i get my monthly crazy fix? with tammy faye gone, the world needs jan as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ba dum bum. but if robertson goes next where will i get my monthly crazy fix? with tammy faye gone, the world needs jan as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14325</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14325</guid>
		<description>I call Charles Stanley based purely on his age.  Of course, I've seen several sub-pastors come to his church thinking the same thing, only to leave for greener pastures after they realize he's NEVER going home.

Shame about Dr. Kennedy, though.  I don't like EE, but I didn't find him anywhere near as obnoxious as Robertson or Falwell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call Charles Stanley based purely on his age.  Of course, I&#8217;ve seen several sub-pastors come to his church thinking the same thing, only to leave for greener pastures after they realize he&#8217;s NEVER going home.</p>
<p>Shame about Dr. Kennedy, though.  I don&#8217;t like EE, but I didn&#8217;t find him anywhere near as obnoxious as Robertson or Falwell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14324</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14324</guid>
		<description>*groans*  I am sad to say that I get it too.  Yes, Graham is probably next, but he's maintained a sense of decorum so I wouldn't even want to put him in the same category as these guys.

Not an evangelical, but what about the Crystal Cathedral dude?  Schuller, isn't it?  He's gotta be pushing 70 or 80 by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*groans*  I am sad to say that I get it too.  Yes, Graham is probably next, but he&#8217;s maintained a sense of decorum so I wouldn&#8217;t even want to put him in the same category as these guys.</p>
<p>Not an evangelical, but what about the Crystal Cathedral dude?  Schuller, isn&#8217;t it?  He&#8217;s gotta be pushing 70 or 80 by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14323</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14323</guid>
		<description>Don't mess with Tammy Fae unless you want the gays on your case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t mess with Tammy Fae unless you want the gays on your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chutney</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14322</link>
		<dc:creator>chutney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14322</guid>
		<description>Forgot about Tammy.  But, no, Tammy hadn't been a leader in the evangelical movement for twenty years.  Felt like she was an evangelical orphan.  A leader in her own way, but not a leader of the movement.  

If you're counting icons, though, then Kennedy makes three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot about Tammy.  But, no, Tammy hadn&#8217;t been a leader in the evangelical movement for twenty years.  Felt like she was an evangelical orphan.  A leader in her own way, but not a leader of the movement.  </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re counting icons, though, then Kennedy makes three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hafidha sofia</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14321</link>
		<dc:creator>hafidha sofia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14321</guid>
		<description>Doesn't Tammy Faye count?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Tammy Faye count?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14320</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14320</guid>
		<description>First one to get it. 

Funny -- this came up today in conversation. I would have thought the easy money was on Billy Graham, but I have a great big soft spot (perhaps misplaced) for him so that's probably not even a nice suggestion.

I, too, went out on a limb and thought Mark Driscoll, from burnout. Heck: he has a "death by ministry" thread on his blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First one to get it. </p>
<p>Funny &#8212; this came up today in conversation. I would have thought the easy money was on Billy Graham, but I have a great big soft spot (perhaps misplaced) for him so that&#8217;s probably not even a nice suggestion.</p>
<p>I, too, went out on a limb and thought Mark Driscoll, from burnout. Heck: he has a &#8220;death by ministry&#8221; thread on his blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
