define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Who will be number three?
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/
One part facial hair. Two parts moxy.Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:48:26 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2
By: chutney
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14330
Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:48:26 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14330Ouch, David. Way to turn the tables on the question.
]]>
By: 4alarm
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14329
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:52:04 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14329for the next fundie to croak or for me to maintain my entertainment level when PR kicks the bucket?
]]>
By: 4alarm
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14327
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:05:33 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14327ba dum bum. but if robertson goes next where will i get my monthly crazy fix? with tammy faye gone, the world needs jan as well.
]]>
By: RB
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14325
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:25:51 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14325I call Charles Stanley based purely on his age. Of course, I’ve seen several sub-pastors come to his church thinking the same thing, only to leave for greener pastures after they realize he’s NEVER going home.
Shame about Dr. Kennedy, though. I don’t like EE, but I didn’t find him anywhere near as obnoxious as Robertson or Falwell.
]]>
By: ck
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14324
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:56:32 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14324*groans* I am sad to say that I get it too. Yes, Graham is probably next, but he’s maintained a sense of decorum so I wouldn’t even want to put him in the same category as these guys.
Not an evangelical, but what about the Crystal Cathedral dude? Schuller, isn’t it? He’s gotta be pushing 70 or 80 by now.
]]>
By: Scott Wells
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14323
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:08:07 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14323Don’t mess with Tammy Fae unless you want the gays on your case.
]]>
By: chutney
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14322
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:58:34 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14322Forgot about Tammy. But, no, Tammy hadn’t been a leader in the evangelical movement for twenty years. Felt like she was an evangelical orphan. A leader in her own way, but not a leader of the movement.
If you’re counting icons, though, then Kennedy makes three.
]]>
By: hafidha sofia
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14321
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:59:43 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14321Doesn’t Tammy Faye count?
]]>
By: Scott Wells
http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14320
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:54:29 +0000http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14320First one to get it.
Funny — this came up today in conversation. I would have thought the easy money was on Billy Graham, but I have a great big soft spot (perhaps misplaced) for him so that’s probably not even a nice suggestion.
I, too, went out on a limb and thought Mark Driscoll, from burnout. Heck: he has a “death by ministry” thread on his blog.