define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Comments on: Who will be number three? http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/ One part facial hair. Two parts moxy. Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:48:26 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: chutney http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14330 Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:48:26 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14330 Ouch, David. Way to turn the tables on the question.

]]>
By: 4alarm http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14329 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:52:04 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14329 for the next fundie to croak or for me to maintain my entertainment level when PR kicks the bucket?

]]>
By: 4alarm http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14327 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:05:33 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14327 ba dum bum. but if robertson goes next where will i get my monthly crazy fix? with tammy faye gone, the world needs jan as well.

]]>
By: RB http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14325 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:25:51 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14325 I call Charles Stanley based purely on his age. Of course, I’ve seen several sub-pastors come to his church thinking the same thing, only to leave for greener pastures after they realize he’s NEVER going home.

Shame about Dr. Kennedy, though. I don’t like EE, but I didn’t find him anywhere near as obnoxious as Robertson or Falwell.

]]>
By: ck http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14324 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:56:32 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14324 *groans* I am sad to say that I get it too. Yes, Graham is probably next, but he’s maintained a sense of decorum so I wouldn’t even want to put him in the same category as these guys.

Not an evangelical, but what about the Crystal Cathedral dude? Schuller, isn’t it? He’s gotta be pushing 70 or 80 by now.

]]>
By: Scott Wells http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14323 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:08:07 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14323 Don’t mess with Tammy Fae unless you want the gays on your case.

]]>
By: chutney http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14322 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:58:34 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14322 Forgot about Tammy. But, no, Tammy hadn’t been a leader in the evangelical movement for twenty years. Felt like she was an evangelical orphan. A leader in her own way, but not a leader of the movement.

If you’re counting icons, though, then Kennedy makes three.

]]>
By: hafidha sofia http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14321 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:59:43 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14321 Doesn’t Tammy Faye count?

]]>
By: Scott Wells http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14320 Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:54:29 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/09/05/who-will-be-number-three/#comment-14320 First one to get it.

Funny — this came up today in conversation. I would have thought the easy money was on Billy Graham, but I have a great big soft spot (perhaps misplaced) for him so that’s probably not even a nice suggestion.

I, too, went out on a limb and thought Mark Driscoll, from burnout. Heck: he has a “death by ministry” thread on his blog.

]]>