define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
i would contend that homemaking and housekeeping are not the same thing, and i think that the undervaluing of homemaking, how much work it is and how much skill it takes to do it well should be one of the major feminist issues of the third wave.
not that i think this particular degree is progressive in any way, especially, as ms. t notes, it’s only for women.
but as hafidha mentions, the concept of the curriculum could be fascinating. and really, why is homemaking any worse or less valid a pursuit than any other? the ministry of motherhood is the most intense spiritual endeavor that i anticipate taking on in my life.
society undervalues professions that are historically associated with women, and i can’t help but think that this is any exception. prereq for an MRS degree, chutney? building a new generation of good people or building more widgets… which seems more critical to social progress to you?
society would be a better place if more smart, sharp, topnotch people became teachers and nurses and, perhaps, homemakers. the world doesn’t need more lawyers, business people and most of the other professions that the arbiters of middle classness tell us are “worthy” of our brains.
and it certainly doesn’t need bright women who want to pursue higher education pushed into mental illness because they want to choose to be homemakers and “waste” their education. or because they feel they have to be both the high-powered attorney and the perfect wife and mother in 24-hours-or-fewer a day.
]]>My only problem with the course is that it’s women-only. I think home-making is really hard work, and it’s definitely real work.
]]>