Comments on: China deadly serious about bureacratic accountability http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/10/china-deadly-serious-about-bureacratic-accountability/ One part facial hair. Two parts moxy. Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:21:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: ogre http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/10/china-deadly-serious-about-bureacratic-accountability/#comment-13359 ogre Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:38:09 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/10/china-deadly-serious-about-bureacratic-accountability/#comment-13359 Worked for the Aztecs. Their legal code was interesting; it held the nobility to a higher standard--at least in regards to being drunk. I can't recall whether it applied to other things as well, but that general concept seems reasonable, to me. With power and position comes greater responsibility... Worked for the Aztecs. Their legal code was interesting; it held the nobility to a higher standard–at least in regards to being drunk. I can’t recall whether it applied to other things as well, but that general concept seems reasonable, to me.

With power and position comes greater responsibility…

]]> By: Will http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/10/china-deadly-serious-about-bureacratic-accountability/#comment-13356 Will Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:05:00 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/07/10/china-deadly-serious-about-bureacratic-accountability/#comment-13356 Hard to argue that the death penalty in that particular instance would not be a deterrent. It does seem like a savage way to make a point. Hard to argue that the death penalty in that particular instance would not be a deterrent. It does seem like a savage way to make a point.

]]>