define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are our individual causes relevant?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/04/08/are-our-individual-causes-relevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/04/08/are-our-individual-causes-relevant/</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:05:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: chutney		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/04/08/are-our-individual-causes-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-9967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/04/08/are-our-individual-causes-relevant/#comment-9967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I dropped the list, then added a link to modern US liberalism in what is now the first sentence. 

It really isn&#039;t the place of an article on UUism to fill out the ambiguity and evolution of political liberalism.  The link I added seems to be trying to do that, so that should suffice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dropped the list, then added a link to modern US liberalism in what is now the first sentence. </p>
<p>It really isn&#8217;t the place of an article on UUism to fill out the ambiguity and evolution of political liberalism.  The link I added seems to be trying to do that, so that should suffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chutney		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/04/08/are-our-individual-causes-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-9855</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/04/08/are-our-individual-causes-relevant/#comment-9855</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But to push back, why is any discussion of individual politics necessary at all?  How is the shifting of &quot;liberal&quot; and &quot;conservative&quot; relevant?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But to push back, why is any discussion of individual politics necessary at all?  How is the shifting of &#8220;liberal&#8221; and &#8220;conservative&#8221; relevant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel Monka		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/04/08/are-our-individual-causes-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-9835</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Monka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 02:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2007/04/08/are-our-individual-causes-relevant/#comment-9835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A list was in fact necessary, because of the way the words &quot;liberal&quot; and &quot;conservative&quot; have changed over the years. Most of that list has, in past years, been supported by old-fashioned Goldwater style conservatives and Libertarians.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A list was in fact necessary, because of the way the words &#8220;liberal&#8221; and &#8220;conservative&#8221; have changed over the years. Most of that list has, in past years, been supported by old-fashioned Goldwater style conservatives and Libertarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>