define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Reviewing &#8220;ReviewMe.com&#8221;&#8212;A better way to pay for your blog?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:46:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Colleen		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/#comment-5435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They have to do that so that the tax man can get his cut.

Have you signed up for any other services that pay you to blog, like Blogitive for example?  (They&#039;re at http://www.blogitive.com ) They&#039;re really ramping up now and putting the call our for bloggers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have to do that so that the tax man can get his cut.</p>
<p>Have you signed up for any other services that pay you to blog, like Blogitive for example?  (They&#8217;re at <a href="http://www.blogitive.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.blogitive.com</a> ) They&#8217;re really ramping up now and putting the call our for bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gathering in light - &#187; Review of Reviewme.com		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gathering in light - &#187; Review of Reviewme.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/#comment-5308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Other related articles: Paul Stamatiou Adam Cleaveland Making Chutney [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Other related articles: Paul Stamatiou Adam Cleaveland Making Chutney [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chutney		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5305</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/#comment-5305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that&#039;s so they can report it all as income.  Google Ads asks for the same thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s so they can report it all as income.  Google Ads asks for the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sanchala		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/#comment-5300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The only thing that makes me wary is that RevieMe wants a SSN or Tax ID. I don&#039;t have a tax ID number, but I sure as heck won&#039;t be giving out my SSN.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing that makes me wary is that RevieMe wants a SSN or Tax ID. I don&#8217;t have a tax ID number, but I sure as heck won&#8217;t be giving out my SSN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OPTIMUSCRIME.COM - &#187; Flack Club		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OPTIMUSCRIME.COM - &#187; Flack Club]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/#comment-5220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] We decided to see whether this description held. We examined the first ten English-language blogs in Technorati&#039;s search results that had a paid ReviewMe review (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10).  These first crop of reviews range from mild and gently-worded constructive criticism to salivating promotion.  So, yeah: unsurprisingly, paid bloggers don&#039;t bite the hand that feeds. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] We decided to see whether this description held. We examined the first ten English-language blogs in Technorati&#8217;s search results that had a paid ReviewMe review (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10).  These first crop of reviews range from mild and gently-worded constructive criticism to salivating promotion.  So, yeah: unsurprisingly, paid bloggers don&#8217;t bite the hand that feeds. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dave		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/2006/11/10/reviewing-reviewmecom-a-better-way-to-pay-for-your-blog/#comment-5218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yea...I have only gotten one ad via text-link-ads, but one link each month is not too bad.  

I am trying out the RevieMe thing to, so we will see.  It sounds like a great idea, and probably better worth money for those trying to get their site noticed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea&#8230;I have only gotten one ad via text-link-ads, but one link each month is not too bad.  </p>
<p>I am trying out the RevieMe thing to, so we will see.  It sounds like a great idea, and probably better worth money for those trying to get their site noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>