define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Thanks for your thoughtful response.
I’m afraid harm might just be as broad a definition of evil as we can agree upon, as least civically. I worked with ethicists for five years, and the notion of harms vs. wrongs came up often. They were a pragmatic bunch, though, and weren’t all that interested in laying it all out for everyone. Wish I could be more helpful here.
To misquote a Supreme Court justice, I think we all know evil when we see it. Those who say there is no evil are either naive or deceived (or both). Perhaps that’s part of why internet conversations are usually shut down when folks bring Hiter into the discussion—he’s an evil we can all agree about, and when folks compare someone to him, it’s tantamount to shutting down civil discourse. (Because it amounts to calling your verbal sparring partner’s position “evil.”)
]]>I note with bemusement that the vast majority of entries for worst Americans are white, male, and politicians. Conservative bloggers and commentators seem more likely to sprinkle in women and minorities. All I would infer from that is the importance of having social power in order to purvey evil– no demographic identity has a corner on the evilness market. Some forms of social power that don’t appear to be getting much (or as much) recognition in this meme war include the economic market (e.g., robber barons), media moguls and personalities (see money), religious leaders.
Another observation: many evils have multiple causes, and to point at one person as the lynchpin is sometimes a dubious act. For example, one person blamed Jeremy Rifkin for keeping useful technology out of the hands of folks who could benefit from it. The biotech enterprise is very much alive and kiciking, and Rifkin is hardly the most influential or only opponent. Further, I am reminded of what a mentor once told me: namely, that given the wealth inequities in our societal structures, every new technonlogy exacerbates the divide between the haves and the have nots. That’s not a service to humanity.
Closing can-opener: other than harm to another human being (which is sometimes justifiable, as in self-defense), is there any broader, meaningful definition of evil we can all agree on?
]]>The atom bomb thing would make my list…but then I don’t hate FDR….
I once sat down with fhree hundred others around then Sec of Defense Robert McNamara’s car, he had just finished speaking at Harvard, they sent the Harvard football squard running out in front of his car to scare us, but three hundred non violent protesters can absorb a football squard.
Any rate McNamara actually got up on top of his limosene and tried to explain Vietnam to us…a crazy kind of integrity was on exhibit there…he didn’t dismiss us….or stay in his car and let his handlers gas us….he wanted to explain…..I think he later came to see he was an idiot.
]]>