Comments on: Anybody for un-theism? http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/10/22/anybody-for-un-theism/ One part facial hair. Two parts moxy. Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:34:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Adrian http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/10/22/anybody-for-un-theism/#comment-9524 Adrian Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:40:11 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=697#comment-9524 Look: Knowledge brings sadness, knowledge brings happiness but is more healthy think about a "God" without all that religic stuff and cult trap, I mean that is more "healthy" think and believe just in "God" itself. To me is more happy believe just in god to die happy, 'cause if there isn't nothing beyond the death at least i'll die happy and if there's something beyond death... that's is my backup plan. Look: Knowledge brings sadness, knowledge brings happiness but is more healthy think about a “God” without all that religic stuff and cult trap, I mean that is more “healthy” think and believe just in “God” itself.
To me is more happy believe just in god to die happy, ’cause if there isn’t nothing beyond the death at least i’ll die happy and if there’s something beyond death… that’s is my backup plan.

]]> By: Welcome UU World readers! at Making Chutney http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/10/22/anybody-for-un-theism/#comment-5214 Welcome UU World readers! at Making Chutney Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:27:53 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=697#comment-5214 [...] “Anybody for un-theism?” (On a Sam Harris article in Huffington Post.) 10/22/2005 [...] [...] “Anybody for un-theism?” (On a Sam Harris article in Huffington Post.) 10/22/2005 [...]

]]> By: Sean Sinjin http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/10/22/anybody-for-un-theism/#comment-3106 Sean Sinjin Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:32:56 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=697#comment-3106 Can I suggest engaging Sean in frank discussion on the BetterHuman.org website? Kind regards, Sean Sinjin BetterHuman.org Authenticity Code: 399011a3-3f41-4be3-a696-a31eb51d817a Can I suggest engaging Sean in frank discussion on the
BetterHuman.org website?

Kind regards,
Sean Sinjin

BetterHuman.org Authenticity Code:
399011a3-3f41-4be3-a696-a31eb51d817a

]]> By: Ted http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/10/22/anybody-for-un-theism/#comment-2751 Ted Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:14:48 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=697#comment-2751 What to do with people like Sean St. John here at http://www.betterhuman.org who advocate oppression to rid the world of religious faith ? What to do with people like Sean St. John here at
http://www.betterhuman.org
who advocate oppression to rid the world of religious faith ?

]]> By: Bill Baar http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/10/22/anybody-for-un-theism/#comment-2731 Bill Baar Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:55:45 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=697#comment-2731 I used to call myself an atheist until reading Paul Tillich's sermon on <a href="http://www.religion-online.org/showchapter.asp?title=375&C=15" rel="nofollow"><em>The New Being</em></a>. It dawned on me belief and unbelief were flip sides of the same coin and the unbeliever often gave stronger evidence of God's presence because the atheists sought God and couldn't find God. I used to call myself an atheist until reading Paul Tillich’s sermon on The New Being. It dawned on me belief and unbelief were flip sides of the same coin and the unbeliever often gave stronger evidence of God’s presence because the atheists sought God and couldn’t find God.

]]> By: chutney http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/10/22/anybody-for-un-theism/#comment-2690 chutney Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:13:41 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=697#comment-2690 Harris is about three centuries too late to be at the vanguard. But I'm sure he'd claim being the vanguard too if you sent him a note about it. ;-) Harris is about three centuries too late to be at the vanguard. But I’m sure he’d claim being the vanguard too if you sent him a note about it. ;-)

]]> By: John Cullinan http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/10/22/anybody-for-un-theism/#comment-2689 John Cullinan Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:44:15 +0000 http://www.makingchutney.com/?p=697#comment-2689 If I read my Karen Armstrong correctly, the original Roman charge of "atheism" meant one denied the existence of someone else's god. It was the charge most often levelled at the early Christians because of their denial of the Roman gods. Perhaps Harris is at the vanguard of a neo-classical revival of Roman atheism? If I read my Karen Armstrong correctly, the original Roman charge of “atheism” meant one denied the existence of someone else’s god. It was the charge most often levelled at the early Christians because of their denial of the Roman gods. Perhaps Harris is at the vanguard of a neo-classical revival of Roman atheism?

]]>