define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: We have to BUY the report??	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/06/23/we-have-to-buy-the-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/06/23/we-have-to-buy-the-report/</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Roger Kuhrt		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/06/23/we-have-to-buy-the-report/comment-page-1/#comment-2531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Kuhrt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2005/06/23/we-have-to-buy-the-report/#comment-2531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you are truly interested in the subject (our core) it would be worth checking out the Lecture Robert Bellah gave to the UUA a few years back.  I think it was the Ware Lecture.  If you google Bellah his site will come up and he has included those remarks there.

Cheerfully,  Roger Kuhrt
PS:  I think his presentation is much for informative that the COA report!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are truly interested in the subject (our core) it would be worth checking out the Lecture Robert Bellah gave to the UUA a few years back.  I think it was the Ware Lecture.  If you google Bellah his site will come up and he has included those remarks there.</p>
<p>Cheerfully,  Roger Kuhrt<br />
PS:  I think his presentation is much for informative that the COA report!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Boy in the bands  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Show me the report!		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/06/23/we-have-to-buy-the-report/comment-page-1/#comment-2529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boy in the bands  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Show me the report!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2005/06/23/we-have-to-buy-the-report/#comment-2529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] hat to buy instead 			 		 	 		 			Show me the report! 	 			 				I had the same response as Chutney: why isn&#8217;t the Commission on Appraisal report available online?  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] hat to buy instead 			 		 	 		 			Show me the report! 	 			 				I had the same response as Chutney: why isn&#8217;t the Commission on Appraisal report available online?  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roger Kuhrt		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2005/06/23/we-have-to-buy-the-report/comment-page-1/#comment-2528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Kuhrt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2005/06/23/we-have-to-buy-the-report/#comment-2528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well the Report says it isn&#039;t the end of a process, but the beginning and everybody on the Commission wants to learn--so teach &#039;em!  I bought it because I want to stay up with what is going on, but I am also kind of living off savings and a free pdf would have been nice.  My cursory reading of the report was disappointing as it appears to report the obvious.  I suspect it is a decent compendium of our current &quot;issues&quot;, but it does not point much of a way to any creative resolutions.  The biggest disappointment for me was the scant numbers of persons who bothered to engage the process--and this included a definite lack of participation by clergy.  I think a much more substantive &quot;report&quot; could be made by taking a representative number of published sermons and doing a content analysis and jotting down what&#039;s being suggested by this &quot;theological&quot;  dialog between pulpit and pew.  The same could be done with Church Newsletters if you want to get a sense of the current praxis within the congregations.

Cheerfully,  Roger Kuhrt
Semi-retired Minister
Tacoma, WA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the Report says it isn&#8217;t the end of a process, but the beginning and everybody on the Commission wants to learn&#8211;so teach &#8217;em!  I bought it because I want to stay up with what is going on, but I am also kind of living off savings and a free pdf would have been nice.  My cursory reading of the report was disappointing as it appears to report the obvious.  I suspect it is a decent compendium of our current &#8220;issues&#8221;, but it does not point much of a way to any creative resolutions.  The biggest disappointment for me was the scant numbers of persons who bothered to engage the process&#8211;and this included a definite lack of participation by clergy.  I think a much more substantive &#8220;report&#8221; could be made by taking a representative number of published sermons and doing a content analysis and jotting down what&#8217;s being suggested by this &#8220;theological&#8221;  dialog between pulpit and pew.  The same could be done with Church Newsletters if you want to get a sense of the current praxis within the congregations.</p>
<p>Cheerfully,  Roger Kuhrt<br />
Semi-retired Minister<br />
Tacoma, WA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>