define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Worth the trouble?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/24/worth-the-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/24/worth-the-trouble/</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: chutney		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/24/worth-the-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/07/24/worth-the-trouble/#comment-471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you.  Naming his implicit eschatology unravels the whole thing.  But could we still have something of a punctuated equilibrium?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  Naming his implicit eschatology unravels the whole thing.  But could we still have something of a punctuated equilibrium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/24/worth-the-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/07/24/worth-the-trouble/#comment-470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If Isaiah weren&#039;t being positively theological himself he might have a point: &quot;The world, one likes to think, has been created for some given purpose and everything in it plays some necessary part.&quot;  And what is the concept of &quot;progress&quot; if not a kind of  ambiguous eschatology?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Isaiah weren&#8217;t being positively theological himself he might have a point: &#8220;The world, one likes to think, has been created for some given purpose and everything in it plays some necessary part.&#8221;  And what is the concept of &#8220;progress&#8221; if not a kind of  ambiguous eschatology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>