define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Early sketch for an &#8216;integralist&#8217; god-talk	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/</link>
	<description>One part facial hair.  Two parts moxy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:01:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: makingchutney.com		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[makingchutney.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/#comment-469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;On integralist ethics&lt;/strong&gt;
(Responding to Daniel&#039;s comments.) One of the things that panentheism implies is that the processes of life, the universe and everything (somehow) mirror (darkly) the processes of god. Under panentheism, to approach the ways of god you should approach ...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On integralist ethics</strong><br />
(Responding to Daniel&#8217;s comments.) One of the things that panentheism implies is that the processes of life, the universe and everything (somehow) mirror (darkly) the processes of god. Under panentheism, to approach the ways of god you should approach &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/#comment-468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I guess I&#039;m just confused about how this appropriation of virtue theory would be implied from panentheistic premises.  Why exactly do you suppose that panentheistic premises would privilege cooperative living and communitarian values/practices?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m just confused about how this appropriation of virtue theory would be implied from panentheistic premises.  Why exactly do you suppose that panentheistic premises would privilege cooperative living and communitarian values/practices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chutney		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/#comment-467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am quite interested in developing a god-talk of sin and evil.  I wish that we were beyond good and evil, but it seems wishful thinking, which is to say, human, all too human.  (I do think we are --or should be-- beyond good and bad.)

4.2 through 4.6 are coming from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/v/virtue.htm&quot;&gt;virtue theory&lt;/a&gt; and my hunch that any truly global religious culture (which isn&#039;t to say a single culture) will have to draw on &lt;em&gt;actual religious traditions&lt;/em&gt; and not on abstractions about them (however helpful those may be).  

A panentheistic anthropology lends itself to talk of participation with god (to twist Platonic language) and to joint heirs and co-workers with god (to twist biblical language).  Panentheistic virtues should be of this cooperative nature, and vices should be a violation somehow of the underlying order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite interested in developing a god-talk of sin and evil.  I wish that we were beyond good and evil, but it seems wishful thinking, which is to say, human, all too human.  (I do think we are &#8211;or should be&#8211; beyond good and bad.)</p>
<p>4.2 through 4.6 are coming from <a href="http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/v/virtue.htm">virtue theory</a> and my hunch that any truly global religious culture (which isn&#8217;t to say a single culture) will have to draw on <em>actual religious traditions</em> and not on abstractions about them (however helpful those may be).  </p>
<p>A panentheistic anthropology lends itself to talk of participation with god (to twist Platonic language) and to joint heirs and co-workers with god (to twist biblical language).  Panentheistic virtues should be of this cooperative nature, and vices should be a violation somehow of the underlying order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chutney		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chutney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 04:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/#comment-466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s all me, baby.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all me, baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Soliday		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Soliday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/#comment-465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is this also from Walter Wink or are you beginning to synthesize his work with your own.  It&#039;s highly intriguing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this also from Walter Wink or are you beginning to synthesize his work with your own.  It&#8217;s highly intriguing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: daniel		</title>
		<link>http://www.makingchutney.com/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2003 23:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makingchutney.com/posts/2003/07/21/early-sketch-for-an-integralist-god-talk/#comment-464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be very interested to see you expand on panentheism relation to your points 4.5 and 4.6 in particular.  What does a panentheistic ethics look like?  Are we &quot;beyond good and evil&quot;?  If so, how?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be very interested to see you expand on panentheism relation to your points 4.5 and 4.6 in particular.  What does a panentheistic ethics look like?  Are we &#8220;beyond good and evil&#8221;?  If so, how?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>